Thesis Analysis

1. Thesis A is weak because it simply states what the paper is on and it does not provide a point to argue on.
2. Thesis A is weak because it states a well known fact and it does not provide anything to build a legit argument on.
3. Thesis B is weak because it is too generalized. It has a point to be argued but it is so broad that it would be difficult to build the argument.
4. Thesis A is weak because it is a simple statement that is nothing more than a summary.
5. Thesis A is weak because it is too lengthy and it brings in personal bias that can distort the reader’s perception of the argument.
O’Brien Thesis:
Although O’Brien’s story “On the Rainy River” can be seen as a direct reflection of the typical emotional turmoil the draftees went through during the Vietnam War, it is also a reflection of the basic need of wanting to be understood by others.
This thesis statement is strong for various reasons. First of all, it brings up two ideas; One that O’Brien’s story is a reflection of his times, and the other that it is a reflection of a basic human need of wanting to be understood. This creates a point on which to build an argument that shows the first one but proves the second one. Secondly this thesis is very specific. It mentions the author, the story, and the timeline along with clearly stating the argument. Lastly, it can be easily supported from the text. Often in the story, O’Brien speaks of his fear that his family will think badly of him. He is constantly worried about what others in society would think. He also speaks of how he appreciated the way the old man did not ask why he had come to his place, how long he would stay, etc. He was also happy at the little gestures of kindness that the old man showed towards him. The old man was accepting him and did not strive to find reasons but simply let it be. This is the evidence that supports the above thesis.